Meta Mark Zuckerberg’s CEO’s decision to eliminate the policies of censorship and modification of the blind contents the company’s supervision board-and U-Turn has led to friction among members, according to a report.
21 Independent Board members, who for years have been tasked with imposing hot buttons related to hate speech on social media platforms on Facebook and on Instagram, were given a little more than a caring head Before Zuckerberg made the announcement last month, Financial Times reported Friday.
Board leadership, which includes former Prime Minister Danish Helle Thorning-Schmidt, initially issued a statement in support of the return of the fact control system.
However, the internal told FT that the statement did not reflect the views of many board members, especially in relation to the release of hate speech restrictions.
Stanford law professor and board co-chairman Michael McConnell observed that the fact-control attempts have historically marked more conservative content than left-wing material, but mourned that Meta chose to implement reforms in an era of elevated political division.
Now, the board is trying to create ways to examine the changes and ensure that they are aligned with human rights principles.
One option in question is to issue a white letter that describes concerns and recommendations, according to the FT report.
Another option is to start a policy advisory thinking, a mechanism that would allow the board to formally request information from Meta and provide non -binding recommendations.
However, this process would require Meta’s approval to move forward, and no decision has been achieved on how to continue.
After closed doors, discussions between board members are said to have been turned on, reported.
Some members see the change as a Zuckerberg attempt to convenience to President Trump, an act that has alarmed European civil rights groups.
Global Technical Justice Coalition, a network of over 250 organizations that includes 55 countries, recently issued an open letter asking all members of the Supervisory Board to resign, accusing them of legitimizing a company that is “dismantling the safeguards for democracy and human rights”.
European countries have implemented strict regulations to curb the content that is considered harmful on social media.
Digital Services Act (DSA), implemented by the European Union, mandates the rapid removal of harmful content, increased transparency policies and more strict modification.
Germany, France and the United Kingdom All have strict laws on books that require technological platforms to monitor the content that removes the speech if it is determined to be “misinformation”. These regulations reflect Europe’s aggressive stance on digital accountability, opposing the US’s most softened policies.
Since its creation in 2020, the Meta Supervisory Board has been seen as a new attempt at the technology industry.
However, critics argue that it serves as a buffer for Zuckerberg to divert responsibility for the company’s controversial decisions.
While the Board operates independently and is funded through a trust, its financial support comes from Meta, which has performed at least $ 35 million a year in its operations by 2027.
A major concern among some board members is the replacement of professional controllers of facts with a crowd approach similar to the “community notes” system used by Elon Musk (formerly Twitter) platform.
Some are afraid that this strategy may be ineffective in regions that experience violent conflict or political instability.
The fact -control repair will come out in the US in the coming months, but it remains unclear whether the changes will last globally.
Another point of strife is the revised policy of the word of Meta’s hatred, which now allows some slurs directed towards marginalized communities to stay on the platform.
Critics worry that this can strengthen authoritarian regimes and further marginalize vulnerable groups, especially immigrants, women and individuals LGBTQ+.
Co -chairman of the Paolo Carozza Supervisory Board, a professor of justice at the University of Notre Dame, has expressed a strong desire to provide meta to the implementation of the fact -control review reviews.
He emphasized the reception that Meta will engage with the board in a “constructive” way, given their history of cooperation, according to FT.
Despite calls for mass resignation, Carozza stated that he is not aware of any board member planning to withdraw.
The Board is considering some cases of hate speech, which can provide a way for it to officially weigh on policy changes.
By accepting internal disputes, he noted that the goal of the board is to facilitate “reasoned, intentional, caring judgment” rather than acting as a monolithic entity.
Meta has rejected the request of the post for comment.
#Mark #Zuckerberg #Board #Meta #Supervisory #Board #Moving #Content #Moderation #Policies #Report
Image Source : nypost.com